Name: Bassford Remele
Address: 100 South 5th Street, Suite 1500, Minneapolis, MN, 55402, US
Telephone: 612.333.3000

Employment Litigation/Advice

From Fortune 500 Companies to non-profit organizations, and every type of employer in between, we provide practical advice and seasoned representation in all matters of employment law. With more than two decades of experience spanning both the state and federal courts, we navigate non-compete disputes, whistleblower claims, discrimination and harassment complaints, wage and hour disagreements, Employee Retirement Income Security Act litigation, and more.

Beyond the courtroom, we help employers draft employee policies, negotiate separation agreements, conduct internal employment investigations, and provide important training designed to keep clients up to date on changes in employment law. Some recent successes include representation of a health care system client facing defamation charges and a local school fighting a wrongful-discharge claim. We regularly win summary judgments in our clients’ favor in Title VII, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) cases. We also defend many companies against EEOC/MDHR charges, regularly obtaining dismissals with no probable cause.

Representative Cases

Defended corporate directors and successfully resolved litigation with the United States Department of Labor involving $39 million sale to ESOP. (2016-2022).

Defended a health care system at trial, obtaining a defense jury verdict in a defamation case.

Obtained early dismissal of qui tam lawsuit seeking multi-million dollar recovery under the Minnesota False Claims Act. (2020).

Represented a health care system, obtaining summary judgment on Title VII/MHRA race and national origin discrimination claims; upheld on appeal. Findlator v. Allina Health, 960 F.3d 512 (8th Cir. 2020).

Served as local counsel for Fortune 5 company in class/collective wage and hour litigation. (2018-2020).

Secured a complete defense verdict in a three-week trial involving more than $20 million in claimed damages for breach of a non-compete agreement and duty of loyalty. (2018). The verdict was upheld on appeal. (2019).

Represented a hospital and a physician, obtaining a Rule 12 dismissal of Section 1983 civil rights and defamation claims; upheld on appeal. Peschong v. Children’s Healthcare, 917 F.3d 656 (8th Cir. 2019).

Represented a healthcare provider, winning summary judgment on a MHRA pregnancy discrimination claim. (2019).

Represented a national restaurant chain in arbitration, obtaining a favorable resolution of a case involving alleged sexual harassment. (2018).

Represented a Fortune 500 company, obtaining a favorable resolution of a case involving alleged sexual abuse by a former employee. (2017).

Represented the former chairman, chief executive officer, and selling-shareholder in a class-action ESOP litigation, winning summary judgment from the district court for the firm’s client on the eve of trial. (Following separate trials on liability and damages, the plaintiff class was awarded more than $15 million in relief. Judgment in favor of the firm’s client was unchallenged on appeal.) Chesemore v. All. Holdings, Inc., 276 F.R.D. 506 (W.D. Wis. 2011); 886 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (W.D. Wis. 2012); aff'd sub nom. Chesemore v. Fenkell, 829 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 2016).

Represented a religious institution, obtaining a favorable resolution of a case involving alleged sexual abuse by a former employee. (2016).

Represented a private secondary school, obtaining a favorable resolution of a case involving a former student’s sexual abuse claims. (2016).

In a case involving ESOP appraisal, successfully resolved contribution and indemnity claims against third-party defendants relating to alleged breach of fiduciary duties under ERISA. (2015).

Represented a school, winning summary judgment in an employment discrimination case involving alleged claims of wrongful discharge, discrimination, and reprisal.

Represented a school in district court and on appeal, winning summary judgment in an employment dispute involving the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Fischer v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 792 F.3d 985 (8th Cir. 2015).

Represented a skilled nursing facility, winning summary judgment on the former employee’s defamation claim.

Represented a global waste service company in district court and on appeal, winning summary judgment in a case alleging discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Senter, 564 F. App'x 273 (8th Cir. 2014).

Represented the Board of Pensions of a large religious denomination, obtaining a voluntary dismissal of a disability benefits lawsuit.

Represented corporate officers, obtaining a favorable resolution in a claim alleging breach of fiduciary duty in removing members of the board of directors.

Comments from clients and the legal community:

Dan Olson at Bassford Remele has been great to work with. He stepped in a difficult situation, made recommendations and was always available to answer questions. (Vice President, Operations, Credit and Collections Industry)

Dan Olson of Bassford Remele was a pleasure to work with: effective, personable, responsive, and helpful. We had a very positive outcome, and I give Dan much of the credit for that. (President, Bank)

I have relied on Bassford Remele for legal support for many years and have been extremely satisfied. My experience working with their attorneys has been positive in many ways, including their responsiveness, knowledge, professionalism and caring attitude.

Bassford Remele has provided expert legal counsel and representation to our organization. Their advice is practical and wise.

Bassford Remele's employment attorneys are excellent. We had the opportunity to work with them multiple times in the past year as we managed personnel issues related to the pandemic and they were extremely responsive and helpful in guiding us to decisions even when there were no clear answers. I appreciate that they take into consideration the practical side of any issue and consider the business implications, as well as the legal ones. I would highly recommend Bassford Remele. (General Counsel, Health Care Provider)

Bassford Remele's labor and employment law team provides exceptional value to our institution. Their lawyers have deep expertise in both employment law and litigation in general. In addition, they are genuinely enjoyable to work with and exceedingly professional. (General Counsel, Education Provider)

Bassford Remele is a terrific partner for us. They drive strong results, are exceptionally responsive, and cost-effective. I highly recommend them. (Senior Vice President, Bank)

We use Bassford Remele for multiple labor and employment needs. They are extremely responsive, knowledgeable, and aware of the budget for a given project. As a non-profit, I appreciate that tremendously. In addition, they provide training and other "value adds" that help me in my work within the organization. They've taken a true interest in *** which makes it that much easier when we have a matter we need them to assist with because they already know the people and the culture. (General Counsel, Health Care Provider)

These comments were collected as part of the U.S. News - Best Lawyers® "Best Law Firms" research process.

The Work Week with Bassford Remele

November 13, 2023
Should Employers Address Mass Shooting Tragedies?

November 6, 2023
NLRB Expanding The Joint Employer Rule

October 30, 2023
The Tricks to Making the Workplace Halloween Party a Treat

October 23, 2023
SHOW ME THE MONEY! Addressing pay inequity with pay-transparency laws

October 16, 2023
It's the Final Countdown...To Mandatory Paid Sick and Safe Leave

October 9, 2023
Who Bears the Liability When an Employee's Email Account Gets Hacked?

October 2, 2023
Supreme Court Hears Two Pivotal Employment Law Cases

September 25, 2023
#BadBoss: How to Approach Negative or Slanderous Commentary on Social Media

September 18, 2023
Employer Considerations When Responding to Employee-Records Requests

September 11, 2023
Department of Labor Introduces New Proposal to Increase Salary Exemption Threshold

September 5, 2023
The NLRB Continues its Trend of Reversing Precedent and Expanding Employee and Union Rights

August 28, 2023
The EEOC Penalizes an Employer for Utilizing AI in the Application Process

August 21, 2023
Advantages and Disadvantages of Employers Implementing Arbitration Agreements With Class and Collective Action Waivers

August 14, 2023
Minnesota's Legislature Has Been Active. What's Going on At the Federal Level?

August 7, 2023
The New Regulations for Cannabis in the Workplace

July 31, 2023
The Next Wave of New Employment Laws Set to Take Effect

July 24, 2023
Are DEI Initiatives a Litigation Risk?

July 17, 2023
Preparing Your Workplace for Legalized Marijuana

July 10, 2023
The End of Covid-Era I-9 Flexibility

July 3, 2023
SCOTUS Reframes Religious Accommodations Under Title VII

June 26, 2023
Changes to Existing Laws Going Into Effect July 1, 2023

June 20, 2023
Employee or Independent Contractor? The NLRB Expands the Definition of Employee

June 12, 2023
Managing Mental Health in the Workplace

June 5, 2023
EEOC Issues New Guidance on AI Use

May 30, 2023
The Unfortunate Workforce Reduction
How to approach layoffs and terminations in this turbulent economy

May 23, 2023
A Historic Legislative Session for Minnesota Employment Law Concludes

May 15, 2023
Legislative and Administrative Update: Paid Family Leave Bill Inching Closer to the Governor's Desk

May 8, 2023
Chat GPB is Everything, Everywhere, All at Once! All you need to know about the chatbot taking the world by storm.

May 1, 2023
What ESG Means for Employers

April 24, 2023
Employer Obligations Related to Employees Expressing Breastmilk

April 17, 2023
The Reemerging Tax Consequences of Remote Work

April 10, 2023
Severance Agreements Under Scrutiny

April 3, 2023
Legislative Update

March 27, 2023
Proposed Paid-Leave Legislation Makes Headlines
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Analysis For Constructive Discharge Discrimination Claims Under Minnesota Human Rights Act

March 20, 2023
Increasing Prosecution of Employers for Wage Theft
5 Reasons Why You Should Hire an Outside Investigator

accolades